This week a judge in the Southern District of New York unsealed whatappears to be a suicide note from Jeffrey Epstein. The note is unsigned and as yet unauthenticated. Many have immediately declared it a fake. But I’ve spent hundreds of hours combing through the Epstein files as a journalist, and there is strong evidence for its authenticity.
First, though: How did this note only come to light now? The pivotal character in this story is Epstein’s original cellmate at the Manhattan Correctional Center, Nicholas Tartaglione. The ex-cop-turned-steroid-dealer and animal rescuer was awaiting trial for quadruple murder. In the early morning ofJuly 23, 2019, Tartaglione began banging on his cell door to summon the guards. They found Epstein unresponsive on the floor with a makeshift noose around his neck.
Under Trump, the Justice Department’s credibility is negligible.
Epstein initially claimed that his cellmate tried to strangle him. This was a dubious allegation, given that it was Tartaglione who yelled for help. Epstein may have made the accusation against his cellmate in order to keep himself off suicide watch and dodge a disciplinary write-up for self-harm. He almost immediately backtracked, however, and said he didn’t remember what happened. Epstein later assured prison staff that he didn’t feel threatened by Tartaglione and that he was happy to continue being housed with him. He was moved anyway.
Last year, Tartaglionetold podcaster Jessica Reed Krausthat he found the note tucked in a book shortly after Epstein’s suicide attempt and handed it over to his lawyer, who used it as evidence of good conduct in Tartaglione’s trial. Because the note was subject to attorney-client privilege, the judge in the case sealed the record. He unsealed it after lawyers for The New York Times successfully argued that Tartaglione nullified the privilege by describing the note on Kraus’ podcast.
The U.S. attorney’s office in Manhattan prosecuted Tartaglione, and many observers are rightly skeptical about anything involving Epstein and this Justice Department. Under President Donald Trump, the department’s credibility is negligible in light of its outrageous foot-dragging on releasing the Epstein files and its frantic attempts to shield the president from the fallout. The acting attorney general, Todd Blanche, Trump’s former personal lawyer, was dispatched to interview Epstein’s accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell last summer. Thereafter, Maxwell was transferred to a cushy prison with yoga and puppies after she said she never saw Trump or Epstein do anything inappropriate.
While we can’t be sure the note is legit until the forensic document examiners weigh in, to me it’s vintage Epstein. For one thing, it starts with a rant about how prosecutors investigated him for “NOTHING!!!” The insistence that the charges against him were baseless and that the government was persecuting him — that’s Jeff, all right.
Furthermore, in poring through the Epstein files, I’ve gotten to know the sex offender’s writing better than I ever wanted to. The handwritingis very similar to a notefound in Epstein’s cell after his death. Both notes include the all-caps phrase “NO FUN” and a liberal sprinkling of double exclamation marks.
Even the note’s most distinctive line strengthens the case for authenticity: “It is a treat to choose my time to say goodbye. Watcha want me to do? — Bust out cryin!!”
Must reads from Today's list
The latter sentence caught the attention of skeptics. “We’re talking about a highly educated individual,” Fox News correspondent Kevin Corketold host Laura Ingraham. “Would he say that? I’m not so certain.”
If the note was forged, the forger would have to know this remarkably obscure reference.
Actually, Epstein was a college dropout whose default email style can charitably be described as a half-literate stream of consciousness. Corke is picking up on something important, however: The words are from someone else. And the Justice Department’s Epstein files have the answer.
The files reveal that Epstein used the obscure “cryin” catchphrase in emails to his brother and his childhood friend. It’s an apparent reference to aLittle Rascals short filmfrom 1931, in which one of the Little Rascals, a Black child named Stymie,brushes offhis friend Farina’s grief that he is about to be shipped off to an orphanage. In both emails, Epstein used it to chide the recipients for getting sentimental about something. It sounds alien to Epstein because it’s a Hollywood screenwriter’s take on African American Vernacular English. But if the note was forged, the forger would have to know this remarkably obscure reference.
And if it’s a forgery, who forged it?Tartaglione’s lawyer insiststhe note is real, but his client might have manufactured it as insurance against an attempted murder accusation from Epstein. Let’s be clear that Tartaglione’s credibility is negligible. He was convicted of four counts of murder. He maintains his innocence, even though the victims were kidnapped from his brother’s bar and the corpses were found in a mass grave on his property. We don’t know if Tartaglione ever saw Epstein’s handwriting, but even if he did and he’s a very proficient forger, that still wouldn’t explain how he’d know about Epstein’s Little Rascals fandom.
