“Botched.” That was apparently House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer’s, R-Ky., assessment of the Justice Department’s handling, or mishandling, of the Epstein files under President Donald Trump. Comer made his critical comments to CNN on Monday night, awkwardly enough, during an attempt to defend the administration from criticism.
Comer also cast some blame on Jeffrey Epstein’s victims for delaying the release of files related to the late sex criminal, suggesting that class action lawsuits and victims’ demands for redactions have caused holdups, despite afederal lawandcongressional subpoenarequiring the release of the vast majority of files related to Epstein.
This explanation doesn’t account for the department withholdingdocuments detailing sexual assault allegationsagainst Trump and other wealthy Epstein associates (all of whom have denied any wrongdoing). Comer’s excuse also doesn’t seem to explaina heavily redacted documentthat details a 2015 probe by the Drug Enforcement Administration into whether Epstein and others used drugs in connection with a prostitution ring. And of course, it doesn’t account for the inadequate redactions thatexposed many victims’ namesand personal details when some documents were initially released.
When CNN’s Jake Tapper noted the Trump administration has not released the files as mandated and has redacted names of individuals in Epstein’s inner circle, the chairman was seemingly forced to concede.
“Well, I think the Justice Department has botched this,”Comer said.“I don’t think anyone in America — Republican or, you know, avid Trump supporter — would defend the way that this has been rolled out.”
Must reads from Today's list
Some might say “botched” is too generous a characterization, given it suggests there was, at some point, a meaningful attempt to meet public expectations and comply with the law.
I can also think of more than a few Republicans who have defended and continue to defend the way the administration has handled the Epstein files, includingTrump, Attorney GeneralPam Bondiand House SpeakerMike Johnson, R-La.
Comer himself has repeatedly thanked the administration for its “commitment to transparency.”
But Comer’s comment Monday was a prime example of the honesty that slips out of the chairman when he’s trying to defend Trump and his allies while discussing Epstein. Another example came in early March, when he said the DOJ in Trump’s first term moved to kill a 2019 state probe into Epstein’s New Mexico ranch.
“The federal government asked New Mexico to stop their investigation, I believe back in 2019, of that ranch,”Comer told Fox News. “So there’s just so many questions about how the government failed the victims and how government failed in trying to prosecute Epstein sooner. I mean, this whole thing doesn’t make sense.”
Ja'han Jones
Ja’han Jones is an MS NOW opinion blogger. He previously wrote The ReidOut Blog.
