But select Democrats, too, are being accused of having ties to the late sex offender as country prepares to vote
In races across the country, Democratic candidates or groups that support them have released ads accusingRepublicansof protecting pedophiles by voting against legislation to release files related toJeffrey Epstein.
The ads appear intended toevoke an emotional responseby accusing candidates of “protecting” Epstein, a notorious pedophile accused of running a sex-trafficking ring involving minors.
Ananalysis from CNNfound that candidates and outside groups have spent more than $35m on Epstein-related ads. Anotherfrom the Washington Postfound that Democrats spent more than $40m on Epstein-related ads across six key Senate races.
In Colorado,ads targeting Republican Jeff Cranknote that the lawmaker voted against releasing the Epstein files.In one, the family members of Virginia Giuffre, a woman who survived abuse at the hands of Epstein and died by suicide last year, claim Crank “covered up Epstein’s crimes to protect Donald Trump”.
Ashley Hinson, a Senate candidate in Iowa,was accusedof voting to “protect her donors” by refusing to vote to release the Epstein files.
“This week I had to explain to my boys, ‘No, Mom does not protect pedophiles,’” Hinsonsaid in a campaign adresponding to attacks over the Epstein files.
Anad targeting Mike Collins, the Republican running for a Georgia Senate seat, says “Mike Collins voted against releasing the Epstein files even after he knew Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation exploited 14-year-old girls for sex”.
Florida Republican Jimmy Patronisfaced an attackfrom his Democratic opponent, claiming he called investigating Epstein “a waste of his time”.
A spokesperson for Crank’s campaign accused the Epstein-related ad of being “intentionally vague”, in a statement tothe Washington Post,because his position was that he would vote against the file’s release until he could be confident that victim information was properly redacted. The campaign also said it was “unfortunate” that his opponent, Jessica Killin, was “preying on a grieving family with the help of the Washington Democrats”.
Crank’s staff invited and met with Giuffre’s family, though Crank himself did not meet with them in person, theNew York Times reported.Crank’s campaign also said it offered to meet with Epstein victims before the vote on the legislation.
Last year, Democrats and a select few HouseRepublicanstried to force a vote on the Epstein files through a discharge petition – a procedure used in Congress to bypass the traditional steps of legislation and force a vote on the House floor.
Donald Trump,who knew Epstein in the 1990sand early 2000s, opposed the discharge petition for the files,reversing his campaign promiseto increase government transparency. House Republicans largely aligned themselves with him, prompting anger from high-profile Trump voters.
Eventually, under pressure from allies, Trump supported the legislation, giving Republican lawmakers the go-ahead to vote for it. All but one House Republican voted for the Epstein Files Transparency Act.
Many of the ads omit the fact that nearly every House Republican voted to release the Epstein files when the Epstein Files Transparency Act came to the floor, although at that point Trump had agreed to sign the legislation and release the files. Instead, the ads refer to Republicans opposing early attempts to force the legislation to the floor.
